Two Faces of Strategic Argumentation in the Law
نویسندگان
چکیده
In strategic argumentation players exchange arguments to prove or reject a claim. This paper discusses and reports on research about two basic issues regarding the game-theoretic understanding of strategic argumentation games in the law: whether such games can be reasonably modelled as zero-sum games and as games with complete information.
منابع مشابه
Designing a strategic model of Iran's oil industry challenges from the perspective of fighting corruption and realizing the rule of law
The present article tries to design the present topic from the perspective of qualitative strategy and take advantage of the content analysis and research data using semi-structured interviews with several experts in the field of oil industry and selected using the theoretical sampling method. The theme network method has been analyzed and described through the process of theoretical coding in ...
متن کاملFunding decisions
Funding decision is one of the financial strategic decisions of a corporation. There are also two other finan-cial strategic decisions that a corporation faces, the investment and the dividend decision. This paper de-scribes briefly the investment and the dividend decision, although its main focus is on funding decision. In de-scribing the funding decision the researchers will first explain the...
متن کاملOn Strategic Argument Selection in Structured Argumentation Systems
This paper deals with strategical issues of arguing agents in a multi-agent setting. We investigate different scenarios of such argumentation games that differ in the protocol used for argumentation, i. e. direct, synchronous, and dialectical argumentation protocols, the awareness that agents have on other agents beliefs, and different settings for the preferences of agents. We give a thorough ...
متن کاملNecessity of Criminal Protection of Intellectual Property Rights with a View to its Moral Basis
Background: For several centuries, there has been a debate about the dimensions of intellectual property to support the thinkers of society and prevent their exploitation. Unfortunately, this invisible and powerful asset is increasingly vulnerable. Therefore, establishing favorable regulations, guaranteeing proper criminal enforcement and effective enforcement of laws in order to protect these ...
متن کاملUnderstanding the Role of Computer-Supported Argumentation in the Strategic Change Process
In this paper the authors develop a conceptual framework for appreciating the use of computer-supported argumentation systems in organisational settings undergoing strategic change. More specifically, the authors concentrate on the role of computer-supported argumentation as catalyst for compensating distortions in the outcome of change, originating from the organisation’s power regime. The fra...
متن کامل